ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2024
Self-perception and self-recognition of facial profiles in adolescents referred to orthodontic treatment.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional dynamic evaluation of facial soft tissue changes following anterior traction in growing Angle Class III malocclusion patients.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- Adolescents' self-recognition of their facial profile: associations with wellbeing, self-esteem and sociodemographic factors.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate self-recognition and self-perception among participants with straight, convex, and concave profiles. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire with questions about demographic information, self-perception of the facial profile, satisfaction with profile esthetics, expectations about profile changes after completing orthodontic treatment, motivational factors, and self-recognition. For the self-recognition question, profiles of the respondents were blackened and inserted into the questionnaire. Participants were categorized into three groups: those exhibiting a convex, straight, and concave profile.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between the straight, concave, and convex profile groups regarding self-recognition and self-perception. Participants showed greater ability in self-recognition than self-perception of their soft-tissue profile (P = .001). Females showed higher capability in self-perception than males (P = .001).
conclusionsSelf-recognition and self-perception of the soft-tissue profile are not influenced by facial convexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.