Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39194985›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Investigating Contrastive Pair Learning's Frontiers in Supervised, Semisupervised, and Self-Supervised Learning.

Bihi Sabiri, Amal Khtira, Bouchra El Asri, Maryem Rhanoui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bihi SabiriIMS Team, ADMIR Laboratory, Rabat IT Center, ENSIAS, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10000, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-568X
Amal KhtiraLASTIMI Laboratory, EST Salé, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Salé 11060, Morocco.
Bouchra El AsriIMS Team, ADMIR Laboratory, Rabat IT Center, ENSIAS, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10000, Morocco.
Maryem RhanouiLaboratory Health Systemic Process (P2S), UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, 69100 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0147-8466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, contrastive learning has been a highly favored method for self-supervised representation learning, which significantly improves the unsupervised training of deep image models. Self-supervised learning is a subset of unsupervised learning in which the learning process is supervised by creating pseudolabels from the data themselves. Using supervised final adjustments after unsupervised pretraining is one way to take the most valuable information from a vast collection of unlabeled data and teach from a small number of labeled instances. This study aims firstly to compare contrastive learning with other traditional learning models; secondly to demonstrate by experimental studies the superiority of contrastive learning during classification; thirdly to fine-tune performance using pretrained models and appropriate hyperparameter selection; and finally to address the challenge of using contrastive learning techniques to produce data representations with semantic meaning that are independent of irrelevant factors like position, lighting, and background. Relying on contrastive techniques, the model efficiently captures meaningful representations by discerning similarities and differences between modified copies of the same image. The proposed strategy, involving unsupervised pretraining followed by supervised fine-tuning, improves the robustness, accuracy, and knowledge extraction of deep image models. The results show that even with a modest 5% of data labeled, the semisupervised model achieves an accuracy of 57.72%. However, the use of supervised learning with a contrastive approach and careful hyperparameter tuning increases accuracy to 85.43%. Further adjustment of the hyperparameters resulted in an excellent accuracy of 88.70%.

Indexed as

contrastive learningcontrastive lossrepresentation learningsimilarity metricsupervised learningunsupervised learningunsupervised pretraining

Identifiers

PMID39194985
PMCPMC11355693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.