ArticleJournal of imaging2024
Automatic Segmentation of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes and Blood Vessels in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) Images Using Deep Learning.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in bronchoscopy: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Endobronchial Ultrasound for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Staging: A Scoping Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Fusing photoacoustic microscopy and ultrasound imaging: an artificial intelligence strategy for vessel enhancement in interventional guidance.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Explainability of a Deep Learning Model for Mediastinal Lymph Node Station Classification in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS).Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- A Deep Learning-Based Detection and Segmentation System for Multimodal Ultrasound Images in the Evaluation of Superficial Lymph Node Metastases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A New Deep Learning-Based Method for Automated Identification of Thoracic Lymph Node Stations in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS): A Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is used in the minimally invasive sampling of thoracic lymph nodes. In lung cancer staging, the accurate assessment of mediastinal structures is essential but challenged by variations in anatomy, image quality, and operator-dependent image interpretation. This study aimed to automatically detect and segment mediastinal lymph nodes and blood vessels employing a novel U-Net architecture-based approach in EBUS images. A total of 1161 EBUS images from 40 patients were annotated. For training and validation, 882 images from 30 patients and 145 images from 5 patients were utilized. A separate set of 134 images was reserved for testing. For lymph node and blood vessel segmentation, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) values of the Dice similarity coefficient were 0.71 ± 0.35 and 0.76 ± 0.38, those of the precision were 0.69 ± 0.36 and 0.82 ± 0.22, those of the sensitivity were 0.71 ± 0.38 and 0.80 ± 0.25, those of the specificity were 0.98 ± 0.02 and 0.99 ± 0.01, and those of the F1 score were 0.85 ± 0.16 and 0.81 ± 0.21, respectively. The average processing and segmentation run-time per image was 55 ± 1 ms (mean ± SD). The new U-Net architecture-based approach (EBUS-AI) could automatically detect and segment mediastinal lymph nodes and blood vessels in EBUS images. The method performed well and was feasible and fast, enabling real-time automatic labeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.