ArticleClinics and practice2024
Analysis of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Risk Factors in Lung Transplantation (LuTx) Patients.
Article in Clinics and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of acute lung injury (ALI) that occurs within 72 h after lung transplantation (LuTx) and is the most common early complication of the procedure. PGD is diagnosed and graded based on the ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen and chest X-ray results. PGD grade 3 increases recipient mortality and the chance of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).
methodThe aim of this retrospective study was to identify new PGD risk factors. The inclusion criteria were met by 59 patients, who all received transplants at the same center between 2010 and 2018. Donor data were taken from records provided by the Polish National Registry of Transplantation and analyzed in three variants: PGD 1-3 vs. PGD 0, PGD 3 vs. PGD 0 and PGD 3 vs. PGD 0-2.
resultsA multiple-factor logistic regression model was used to identify decreasing recipient age; higher donor BMI and higher donor central venous pressure (CVP) for the PGD (of the 1-3 grade) risk factor.
conclusionsLonger cold ischemia time (CIT) and higher donor CVP proved to be independent risk factors of PGD 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.