ArticleBiosensors2024
Impedance Characteristics of Microfluidic Channels and Integrated Coplanar Parallel Electrodes as Design Parameters for Whole-Channel Analysis in Organ-on-Chip Micro-Systems.
Article in Biosensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Low-Voltage Microfluidics With On-Chip Electrospray Ionization for Miniaturized Protein Analysis.Small methods · 2026Review
- Rapid Finger-Pump Microfluidic Paper-Based Assay Platform for Monitoring Calcium Ions in Human Biofluids.Biosensors · 2026Article
- MICROWAVE BIOSENSORS for SINGLE-CELL DIELECTRIC CHARACTERIZATION: a REVIEW.IEEE microwave magazine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidics have revolutionized cell culture by allowing for precise physical and chemical environmental control. Coupled with electrodes, microfluidic cell culture can be activated or have its changes sensed in real-time. We used our previously developed reliable and stable microfluidic device for cell growth and monitoring to design, fabricate, and characterize a whole-channel impedance-based sensor and used it to systematically assess the electrical and electrochemical influences of microfluidic channel boundaries coupled with varying electrode sizes, distances, coatings, and cell coverage. Our investigation includes both theoretical and experimental approaches to investigate how design parameters and insulating boundary conditions change impedance characteristics. We examined the system with various solutions using a frequency range of 0.5 Hz to 1 MHz and a modulation voltage of 50 mV. The results show that impedance is directly proportional to electrode distance and inversely proportional to electrode coating, area, and channel size. We also demonstrate that electrode spacing is a dominant factor contributing to impedance. In the end, we summarize all the relationships found and comment on the appropriateness of using this system to investigate barrier cells in blood vessel models and organ-on-a-chip devices. This fundamental study can help in the careful design of microfluidic culture constructs and models that require channel geometries and impedance-based biosensing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.