ArticleBiosensors2024
Electrotactile BCI for Top-Down Somatosensory Training: Clinical Feasibility Trial of Online BCI Control in Subacute Stroke Patients.
Article in Biosensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A lightweight durable full-body electrical stimulation suit for haptic feedback and therapeutic applications.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Improving the Performance of Electrotactile Brain-Computer Interface Using Machine Learning Methods on Multi-Channel Features of Somatosensory Event-Related Potentials.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Development of a Multicommand Tactile Event-Related Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interface Utilizing a Low-Cost Wearable Vibrotactile Stimulator.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the feasibility of a novel brain-computer interface (BCI) device designed for sensory training following stroke. The BCI system administers electrotactile stimuli to the user's forearm, mirroring classical sensory training interventions. Concurrently, selective attention tasks are employed to modulate electrophysiological brain responses (somatosensory event-related potentials-sERPs), reflecting cortical excitability in related sensorimotor areas. The BCI identifies attention-induced changes in the brain's reactions to stimulation in an online manner. The study protocol assesses the feasibility of online binary classification of selective attention focus in ten subacute stroke patients. Each experimental session includes a BCI training phase for data collection and classifier training, followed by a BCI test phase to evaluate online classification of selective tactile attention based on sERP. During online classification tests, patients complete 20 repetitions of selective attention tasks with feedback on attention focus recognition. Using a single electroencephalographic channel, attention classification accuracy ranges from 70% to 100% across all patients. The significance of this novel BCI paradigm lies in its ability to quantitatively measure selective tactile attention resources throughout the therapy session, introducing a top-down approach to classical sensory training interventions based on repeated neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.