Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39194480›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Improved Binary Walrus Optimizer with Golden Sine Disturbance and Population Regeneration Mechanism to Solve Feature Selection Problems.

Yanyu Geng, Ying Li, Chunyan Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanyu GengCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Ying LiCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Chunyan DengCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feature selection (FS) is a significant dimensionality reduction technique in machine learning and data mining that is adept at managing high-dimensional data efficiently and enhancing model performance. Metaheuristic algorithms have become one of the most promising solutions in FS owing to their powerful search capabilities as well as their performance. In this paper, the novel improved binary walrus optimizer (WO) algorithm utilizing the golden sine strategy, elite opposition-based learning (EOBL), and population regeneration mechanism (BGEPWO) is proposed for FS. First, the population is initialized using an iterative chaotic map with infinite collapses (ICMIC) chaotic map to improve the diversity. Second, a safe signal is obtained by introducing an adaptive operator to enhance the stability of the WO and optimize the trade-off between exploration and exploitation of the algorithm. Third, BGEPWO innovatively designs a population regeneration mechanism to continuously eliminate hopeless individuals and generate new promising ones, which keeps the population moving toward the optimal solution and accelerates the convergence process. Fourth, EOBL is used to guide the escape behavior of the walrus to expand the search range. Finally, the golden sine strategy is utilized for perturbing the population in the late iteration to improve the algorithm's capacity to evade local optima. The BGEPWO algorithm underwent evaluation on 21 datasets of different sizes and was compared with the BWO algorithm and 10 other representative optimization algorithms. The experimental results demonstrate that BGEPWO outperforms these competing algorithms in terms of fitness value, number of selected features, and

Indexed as

chaos mappingfeature selectionmetaheuristic optimizationpopulation regeneration mechanismwalrus optimizer

Identifiers

PMID39194480
PMCPMC11352133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.