ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Stability and Controller Research of Double-Wing FMAV System Based on Controllable Tail.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid LQR-HBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gust Response and Alleviation of Avian-Inspired In-Plane Folding Wings.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to enhance the stability and response speed of a passive stabilized double-wing flapping micro air vehicle (FMAV) by implementing a feedback-controlled biomimetic tail. A model for flapping wings accurately calculated the lift force with only a 2.4% error compared to the experimental data. Experimental tests established the relationship between control torque and tail area, swing angle, and wing-tail spacing. A stability model for the double-wing FMAV was developed, incorporating stabilizing sails. Linearization of the hovering state facilitated the design of a simulation controller to improve response speed. By adjusting the feedback loops of velocity, angle, and angular velocity, the tail controller reduced the angle simulation response time from 4 s to 0.1 s and the velocity response time from 5.64 s to 0.1 s. In take-off experiments, a passive stabilized prototype with an adjustable tail angle exhibited enhanced flight stability compared to fixed tails, reducing standard deviation by 72.96% at a 0° take-off angle and 56.85% at a 5° take-off angle. The control axis standard deviation decreased by 38.06% compared to the passive stability axis, confirming the effectiveness of the designed tail angle controller in reducing angular deflection and improving flight stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.