Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39194193›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024

Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of commercial anti-dengue virus IgG tests to identify persons eligible for dengue vaccination.

Freddy A Medina, Frances Vila, Laura E Adams, Jaime Cardona, Jessica Carrion, Elaine Lamirande, Luz N Acosta, Carlos M De León-Rodríguez, Manuela Beltran, Demian Grau and 8 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnostic Techniques for Dengue Virus.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fatal dengue virus infection in an unvaccinated traveler.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Freddy A MedinaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1320-593X
Frances VilaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0635-3010
Laura E AdamsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Jaime CardonaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Jessica CarrionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Elaine LamirandeNational Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Luz N AcostaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Carlos M De León-RodríguezCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Manuela BeltranCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Demian GrauCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Vanessa Rivera-AmillPonce Health Sciences University/Ponce Research Institute, Ponce, Puerto Rico, USA.
Angel BalmasedaLaboratorio Nacional de Virología, Centro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministerio de Salud, Managua, Nicaragua.
Eva HarrisDivision of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7238-4037
Zachary J MadewellCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Stephen H WatermanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Gabriela Paz-BaileyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Stephen WhiteheadNational Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6707-482X
Jorge L Muñoz-JordánCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.

Funding

HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) U01CK000437, U01CK000580NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000437NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended that dengue pre-vaccination screening tests for Dengvaxia administration have at least 98% specificity and 75% sensitivity. This study evaluates the performance of commercial anti-DENV IgG tests to identify tests that could be used for pre-vaccination screening. First, for seven tests, we evaluated sensitivity and specificity in early convalescent dengue virus (DENV) infection, using 44 samples collected 7-30 days after symptom onset and confirmed by RT-PCR. Next, for the five best-performing tests and two additional tests (with and without an external test reader) that became available later, we evaluated performance to detect past dengue infection among a panel of 44 specimens collected in 2018-2019 from healthy 9- to 16-year-old children from Puerto Rico. Finally, a full-scale evaluation was done with the four best-performing tests using 400 specimens from the same population. We used virus focus reduction neutralization test and an in-house DENV IgG ELISA as reference standards. Of seven tests, five showed ≥75% sensitivity in detecting anti-DENV IgG in early convalescent specimens with low cross-reactivity to the Zika virus. For the detection of previous DENV infections, the tests with the highest performance were the Euroimmun NS1 IgG ELISA (sensitivity 84.5%, specificity 97.1%) and CTK Dengue IgG rapid test R0065C with the test reader (sensitivity 76.2% specificity 98.1%). There are IgG tests available that can be used to accurately classify individuals with previous DENV infection as eligible for dengue vaccination to support safe vaccine implementation. IMPORTANCE: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has set forth recommendations that dengue pre-vaccination screening tests must exhibit at least 98% specificity and 75% sensitivity. Our research rigorously assesses the performance of various commercial tests against these benchmarks using well-characterized specimens from Puerto Rico. The findings from our study are particularly relevant given FDA approval and ACIP recommendation of Sanofi Pasteur's Dengvaxia vaccine, highlighting the need for accurate pre-vaccination screening tools.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralDengueDengue VaccinesDengue VirusImmunoglobulin GSensitivity and SpecificityAdolescentChildEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleNeutralization TestsPuerto RicoVaccinationAntibodies, ViralDengue VaccinesImmunoglobulin Gcross-reactivitydengueELISAIgGpre-vaccinationrapid diagnostic testscreeningvaccinevirusZika

Identifiers

PMID39194193
PMCPMC11481482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.