Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39194069›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2024

Perspectives of primary care providers regarding multicancer early detection panels.

Benjamin E Ueberroth, Richard J Presutti, Alyssa McGary, Mitesh J Borad, Neera Agrwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin E UeberrothDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8882-2348
Richard J PresuttiDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6990-1323
Alyssa McGaryDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6654-570X
Mitesh J BoradMayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-2658
Neera AgrwalDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMulticancer early detection panels have recently become available to patients with healthcare provider prescriptions and available funds. These tests utilize circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to screen more than 50 cancers using a single blood sample. However, perspectives and data on how the deployment of these tests may impact the practices of primary care providers in terms of implementation, interpretation, documentation, and costs are limited. This study aimed to assess the perspectives of primary care providers regarding the integration of multicancer early detection panels into clinical practice.

methodsWe used a survey to assess the opinions and perspectives of primary care providers, including physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, across a multistate, tertiary healthcare system. We used a single form consisting of novel questions on familiarity with multi-cancer early detection panels, cost, healthcare equity, documentation, medicolegal, and other concerns. The subgroup analysis was consistent with stratification based on familiarity with ctDNA-based tests and their roles in clinical practice.

resultsMost respondents were unfamiliar with multicancer early detection panels and had not used ctDNA-based tests. Most primary care providers suggested that they would reorder multicancer early detection panel testing at 1- to 5-year intervals and prefer subspecialists for both ordering multicancer early detection panels as well as interpreting their results. Relative concerns differed between physicians and nonphysicians.

conclusionThe integration of multicancer early detection panels into primary care practice requires careful planning and consideration for the management of increased clinical load, interpretation of results, and cost management.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPrimary Health CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCirculating Tumor DNAFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleNeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID39194069
PMCPMC11323832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.