ArticleClinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.)2018
A targeted proteomics approach to amyloidosis typing.
Article in Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Localized primary tracheobronchial AL amyloidosis with posterior wall sparing: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Current Standards and Perspectives in Proteomics for Cardiac Amyloidosis.Analytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Assessment of health impacts in retired antisera-producing horses: Blood biochemistry and serum amyloid A analysis.Veterinary world · 2024Article
- Tissue Characterization in Cardiac Amyloidosis.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Amyloidosis: What does pathology offer? The evolving field of tissue biopsy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Amyloidosis is a life threatening disease caused by deposition of various types of blood serum proteins in organs and tissues. Knowing the type of protein involved is the basis of a correct diagnosis and personalized medical treatment. While the classical approach uses immunohistochemistry, in recent years, laser micro-dissection, followed by high resolution LC-MS/MS, has been shown to provide superior diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. This techniques, however, is only available at major reference proteomics centers. Objective: To perform clinical amyloid protein typing using low-resolution mass spectrometry and no laser micro dissection (LMD), we developed a targeted proteomics approach for the determination of both frequently encountered amyloid proteins (i.e., κ and -λ immunoglobulin light chains and transthyretin (TTR)) and specific reference proteins (i.e., actin (A) for cardiac muscle tissue, or fatty acid binding protein 4 (FBP4) for subcutaneous adipose tissue) in histologic specimens. Method: Small tissue fragments and/or histological sections were digested to yield a protein mixture that was subsequently reduced, alkylated and trypsinized to obtain a peptide mixture. After SPE purification and LC separation, proteotypic peptides were detected by their MRM transitions. Results: The method showed high specificity and sensitivity for amyloid protein proteotypic peptides. LODs were 1.0, 0.1, 0.2 picomoles in cardiac muscle tissue (CMT) and 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 picomoles in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) for TTR, κ-, and λ-LC proteins, respectively. Amyloid to tissue-specific protein signal ratios correlated with the presence of amyloid deposits in clinical samples. Conclusions: This targeted proteomics approach enables sensitive and specific discrimination of amyloidosis affected tissues for the purpose of clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.