ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2024
In vitro/In vivo Evaluations of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles with Different Geometry.
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydroxyapatite-based bone repair biomaterials based on clinical heterogeneity: modification strategies, performance regulation, and personalized repair pathways.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Aspartic acid-facilitated remineralization: a bio-inspired alternative to fluoride for enamel repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Hydroxyapatite-based nanoparticles have found diverse applications in drug delivery, gene carriers, diagnostics, bioimaging and tissue engineering, owing to their ability to easily enter the bloodstream and target specific sites. However, there is limited understanding of the potential adverse effects and molecular mechanisms of these nanoparticles with varying geometries upon their entry into the bloodstream. Here, we used two commercially available hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (HANPs) with different geometries (less than 100 nm in size each) to investigate this issue. Methods: First, the particle size, Zeta potential, and surface morphology of nano-hydroxyapatite were characterized. Subsequently, the effects of 2~2000 μM nano-hydroxyapatite on the proliferation, migration, cell cycle distribution, and apoptosis levels of umbilical vein endothelial cells were evaluated. Additionally, the impact of nanoparticles of various shapes on the differential expression of genes was investigated using transcriptome sequencing. Additionally, we investigated the in vivo biocompatibility of HANPs through gavage administration of nanohydroxyapatite in mice. Results: Our results demonstrate that while rod-shaped HANPs promote proliferation in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell (HUVEC) monolayers at 200 μM, sphere-shaped HANPs exhibit significant toxicity to these monolayers at the same concentration, inducing apoptosis/necrosis and S-phase cell cycle arrest through inflammation. Additionally, sphere-shaped HANPs enhance SULT1A3 levels relative to rod-shaped HANPs, facilitating chemical carcinogenesis-DNA adduct signaling pathways in HUVEC monolayers. In vivo experiments have shown that while HANPs can influence the number of blood cells and comprehensive metabolic indicators in blood, they do not exhibit significant toxicity. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that the geometry and surface area of HANPs significantly affect VEC survival status and proliferation. These findings hold significant implications for the optimization of biomaterials in cell engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.