Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39193499›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Cardiac ultrasound simulation for autonomous ultrasound navigation.

Abdoul Aziz Amadou, Laura Peralta, Paul Dryburgh, Paul Klein, Kaloian Petkov, R James Housden, Vivek Singh, Rui Liao, Young-Ho Kim, Florin C Ghesu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Abdoul Aziz AmadouDepartment of Surgical & Interventional Engineering, King's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Laura PeraltaDepartment of Surgical & Interventional Engineering, King's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Paul DryburghDepartment of Surgical & Interventional Engineering, King's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Paul KleinSiemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Kaloian PetkovSiemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, NJ, United States.
R James HousdenDepartment of Surgical & Interventional Engineering, King's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Vivek SinghSiemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Rui LiaoSiemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Young-Ho KimSiemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Florin C GhesuSiemens Healthineers AG, Digital Technology and Innovation, Erlangen, Germany.
Tommaso MansiSiemens Healthineers, Digital Technology and Innovation, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Ronak RajaniDepartment of Surgical & Interventional Engineering, King's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Alistair YoungDepartment of Surgical & Interventional Engineering, King's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Kawal RhodeDepartment of Surgical & Interventional Engineering, King's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound is well-established as an imaging modality for diagnostic and interventional purposes. However, the image quality varies with operator skills as acquiring and interpreting ultrasound images requires extensive training due to the imaging artefacts, the range of acquisition parameters and the variability of patient anatomies. Automating the image acquisition task could improve acquisition reproducibility and quality but training such an algorithm requires large amounts of navigation data, not saved in routine examinations. Methods: We propose a method to generate large amounts of ultrasound images from other modalities and from arbitrary positions, such that this pipeline can later be used by learning algorithms for navigation. We present a novel simulation pipeline which uses segmentations from other modalities, an optimized volumetric data representation and GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo path tracing to generate view-dependent and patient-specific ultrasound images. Results: We extensively validate the correctness of our pipeline with a phantom experiment, where structures' sizes, contrast and speckle noise properties are assessed. Furthermore, we demonstrate its usability to train neural networks for navigation in an echocardiography view classification experiment by generating synthetic images from more than 1,000 patients. Networks pre-trained with our simulations achieve significantly superior performance in settings where large real datasets are not available, especially for under-represented classes. Discussion: The proposed approach allows for fast and accurate patient-specific ultrasound image generation, and its usability for training networks for navigation-related tasks is demonstrated.

Indexed as

echocardiographyMonte-Carlo integrationpath tracingsimulationultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39193499
PMCPMC11347295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.