ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Clinical characteristics and biomarkers feature analysis using a proteomics platform in young patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identification of key proteins and pathways in myocardial infarction using machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in prehospital assessment of acute coronary syndrome: a scoping review.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In recent years, ACS has been reported to be associated with age, and the incidence has become more common in younger patients. Previous studies have identified various risk factors that contribute to the stratification of ACS patients. However, it remains unclear whether these risk factors, along with proteomic and clinical characteristics, are applicable to young ACS patients, as they are for middle-aged and elderly patients. This study aimed to investigate the proteomics, risk factors, and clinical characteristics of young ACS patients, as well as the differences between them and middle-aged and elderly ACS patients. By comparing these findings with those of middle-aged and elderly patients, we aimed to identify any discrepancies and these findings possibly may have implications for future management strategies of this specific population. Methods: This observational study included a total of 187 participants diagnosed with ACS and 17 young healthy individuals as the control group. ACS patients were divided into three age groups: <45 years old, 45-60 years old, and 61-75 years old. The control group consisted of healthy individuals under the age of 45 who underwent coronary angiography and were excluded from CAD. We collected clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and echocardiographic results from each participant. Additionally, blood samples were collected for further analysis of relevant proteomic and arteriosclerosis marker data using proteomics analysis. Results: Our findings revealed that the presence of certain key factors was associated with a significantly difference in patients with ACS aged younger than 45 years, and this association differed from that of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in patients older than 45 years. Specifically, a higher body mass index and hyperlipidemia were found to be associated with an increased risk of ACS morbidity in young adults (<45 years old) compared to middle-aged and elderly individuals. Furthermore, our findings indicated that the expression levels of growth differentiation factor 15, osteopontin, and NT-proBNP were significantly different among the groups. Conclusion: In summary, our study revealed that the main pathogenic factors of ACS patients under 45 years of age differed from those of middle-aged and elderly patients. These findings may contribute to the prevention and treatment strategies for young patients with ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.