ArticleComputing in cardiology2023
Capturing the Influence of Conduction Velocity on Epicardial Activation Patterns Using Uncertainty Quantification.
Article in Computing in cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A computational study on the influence of antegrade accessory pathway location on the 12-lead electrocardiogram in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Application of Order and Sample Selection in Uncertainty Quantification of Cardiac Models.Computing in cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual variability in parameter settings, due to either user selection or disease states, can impact accuracy when simulating the electrical behavior of the heart. Here, we aim to test the impact of inevitable uncertainty in conduction velocities (CVs) on the output of simulations of cardiac propagation, given three stimulus locations on the left ventricular (LV) free wall. To understand the role of physiological variability in CV in simulations of cardiac activation, we generated detailed maps of the variability in propagation simulations by implementing bi-ventricular activation simulations and quantified the effects by deploying robust uncertainty quantification techniques based on polynomial chaos expansion (PCE). PCE allows efficient stochastic exploration with reduced computational demand by utilizing an emulator for the underlying forward model. Our results suggest that CV within healthy physiological ranges plays a small role in the activation times across all stimulation locations. However, we noticed differences in variation coefficients depending on the stimulation site, i.e., LV endocardium, midmyocardium, and epicardium. We observed low levels of variation in activation times near the earliest activation sites, whereas there was higher variation toward the termination sites. These results suggest that CV variability can play a role when simulating healthy and diseased states.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.