Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39193472›Full record

ReviewOxford open immunology2024

The gut-lung axis: the impact of the gut mycobiome on pulmonary diseases and infections.

Emily A Sey, Adilia Warris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oxford open immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Autophagy andFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gut-Adipose Tissue Axis and Metabolic Health.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily A SeyMedical Research Council Centre for Medical Mycology, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7348-9241
Adilia WarrisMedical Research Council Centre for Medical Mycology, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21047Medical Research Council MR/V033417/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastrointestinal tract contains a diverse microbiome consisting of bacteria, fungi, viruses and archaea. Although these microbes usually reside as commensal organisms, it is now well established that higher abundance of specific bacterial or fungal species, or loss of diversity in the microbiome can significantly affect development, progression and outcomes in disease. Studies have mainly focused on the effects of bacteria, however, the impact of other microbes, such as fungi, has received increased attention in the last few years. Fungi only represent around 0.1% of the total gut microbial population. However, key fungal taxa such as

Indexed as

gut-lung axislung infectionsMycobiome

Identifiers

PMID39193472
PMCPMC11316619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.