ArticleClinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.)2016
Rapid screening and identification of novel psychoactive substances using PaperSpray interfaced to high resolution mass spectrometry.
Article in Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma drug screening using paper spray mass spectrometry with integrated solid phase extraction.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Article
- Acute Cardiovascular and Cardiorespiratory Effects of JWH-018 in Awake and Freely Moving Mice: Mechanism of Action and Possible Antidotal Interventions?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Multilevel omics for the discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets for stroke.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2020Review
- Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Polyphenols in Lamiaceae Plants-A Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The simple and rapid detection and identification of designer drugs is of substantial importance to forensic scientists and law enforcement. Although synthetic cathinones, cannabinoids, and other common novel psychoactive substances (NPS) are produced for purposes that do not include human consumption, they are regularly abused. The analysis of these compounds is often achieved using mass spectrometry, but can be complicated by the lack of spectral libraries and the scarcity of simple and reliable sample introduction techniques. PaperSpray® ionization is a new, automated technique for rapid analysis of samples, without chromatography or prior purification. Matrix, such as powder or plant material, is dissolved or extracted with common solvents and deposited directly on disposable PaperSpray® cartridges for high-throughput, automated analysis. The combination of PaperSpray® sample introduction and High Resolution Accurate Mass Spectrometry (HRAM) provides a powerful and simple tool for identification of new substances, without requiring reference standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.