ArticleIDCases2024
Acute vision changes as the presenting symptom of ocular syphilis - A case series of two.
Article in IDCases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Syphilis, a bacterial infection caused by Treponema pallidum, can affect a wide variety of organ systems of its host. We aim to present the cases of two patients who presented to an urban, tertiary care, academic Emergency Department with ocular symptoms who underwent imaging, laboratory, and specialist evaluation and were ultimately diagnosed with ocular syphilis. Case Report: The first patient is a 46-year-old female who presented to the Emergency Department with painless complete vision loss in a unilateral eye. Her exam was significant for bilateral papilledema, and further workup revealed a retinal detachment in the affected eye. Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titers resulted positive with 1:128 and a reactive fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA). Further workup including lumbar puncture and magnetic resonance imaging were unable to be obtained due to patient refusal and multiple discharges against medical advice. The second patient is a 38-year-old female with a history of intravenous drug use who presented for bilateral circumferential peripheral vision loss with central sparing. The examination showed bilateral papilledema. Lumbar puncture was performed with normal intracranial pressure. RPR titers resulted positive with 1:128. MRI and ophthalmology evaluation did not reveal any other etiology or explanation for papilledema. Conclusion: This case series highlights the importance of considering syphilis as a possible cause of ocular symptoms in high risk patient populations and the need for prompt and appropriate treatment given the increasing prevalence of syphilis worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.