Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39193403›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024

Evaluating a novel vertical traction device for early closure in open abdomen management: a consecutive case series.

J Dohmen, D Weissinger, A S T Peter, A Theodorou, J C Kalff, B Stoffels, P Lingohr, M von Websky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. FasciotensHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J DohmenDepartment of Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
D WeissingerDepartment of Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
A S T PeterDepartment of Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
A TheodorouDepartment of Surgery, Ippokrateio University Hospital Athens, Athens, Greece.
J C KalffDepartment of Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
B StoffelsDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Cellitinnen-Hospital Holy Spirit, Cologne, Germany.
P LingohrDepartment of Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
M von WebskyDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In emergency surgery, managing abdominal sepsis and critically ill patients with imminent abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) using an open abdomen (OA) approach has become standard practice for damage control. To prevent significant complications associated with OA therapy, such as abdominal infections, entero-atmospheric fistula (EAF), and abdominal wall hernia formation, early definitive fascial closure (DFC) is crucial. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a novel device designed to facilitate early fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. Methods: Between 2019 and 2020, nine patients undergoing open abdomen management were enrolled in this study. All patients were treated using vertical mesh-mediated fascial traction combined with a novel vertical traction device (VTD). Data from these cases were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Results: In this study, all patients were treated with OA due to impending ACS. Three patients died before achieving DFC, while the remaining six patients successfully underwent DFC. The mean number of surgical procedures after OA was 3 ± 1, and the mean time to DFC was 9 ± 3 days. The use of the VTD in combination with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) resulted in a 76% reduction in fascia-to-fascia distance until DFC was achieved. The application of the VTD did not affect ventilation parameters or the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), but intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was reduced from 31 ± 8 mmHg prior to OA to 8.5 ± 2 mmHg after applying the device. The primary complication associated with the device was skin irritation, with three patients developing skin blisters as the most severe manifestation. Conclusion: Overall, the novel VTD appears to be a safe and feasible option for managing OA cases. It may reduce complications associated with OA by promoting early definitive fascial closure.

Indexed as

abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS)definitive fascial closure (DFC)negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)open abdomen (OA)temporary abdominal closure (TAC)vertical traction device (VTD)

Identifiers

PMID39193403
PMCPMC11347325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.