ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Single versus multiple fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for medium-sized brain metastases (4-14 cc in volume): reducing or fractionating the radiosurgery dose?
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery vs. hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for resected brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Dosimetric and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Single-Isocenter Linac-Based Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases (BM) and resection cavities is a widely used and effective treatment modality. Based on target lesion size and anatomical location, single fraction SRS (SF-SRS) or multiple fraction SRS (MF-SRS) are applied. Current clinical recommendations conditionally recommend either reduced dose SF-SRS or MF-SRS for medium-sized BM (2-2.9 cm in diameter). Despite excellent local control rates, SRS carries the risk of radionecrosis (RN). The purpose of this study was to assess the 12-months local control (LC) rate and 12-months RN rate of this specific patient population. Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective study included 54 patients with medium-sized intact BM (n=28) or resection cavities (n=30) treated with either SF-SRS or MF-SRS. Follow-up MRI was used to determine LC and RN using a modification of the "Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System" (BT-RADS) scoring system. Results: The 12-month LC rate following treatment of intact BM was 66.7% for SF-SRS and 60.0% for MF-SRS (p=1.000). For resection cavities, the 12-month LC rate was 92.9%% after SF-SRS and 46.2% after MF-SRS (p=0.013). For intact BM, RN rate was 17.6% for SF-SRS and 20.0% for MF-SRS (p=1.000). For resection cavities, RN rate was 28.6% for SF-SRS and 20.0% for MF-SRS (p=1.000). Conclusion: Patients with intact BM showed no statistically significant differences in 12-months LC and RN rate following SF-SRS or MF-SRS. In patients with resection cavities the 12-months LC rate was significantly better following SF-SRS, with no increase in the RNFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.