ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Hematological indicator-based machine learning models for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of hematological biomarkers as diagnostic tool in pre-cancerous patients.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- PTK6 mediated immune signatures revealed by single cell transcriptomic and multi omics big data analysis in cervical cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Recent advances in applications of machine learning in cervical cancer research: a focus on prediction models.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
- Prediction of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer patients using AdaBoost machine learning model: analysis of risk factors.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence applied to cervical cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of clinical outcomes in cervical cancer using routine hematological indices: development and web implementation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic factor for cervical cancer (CC) and determines the treatment strategy. Hematological indicators have been reported as being useful biomarkers for the prognosis of a variety of cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of machine learning models characterized by preoperative hematological indicators to predict the LNM status of CC patients before surgery. Methods: The clinical data of 236 patients with pathologically confirmed CC were retrospectively analyzed at the Gynecology Oncology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University from November 2020 to August 2022. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to select 21 features from 35 hematological indicators and for the construction of 6 machine learning predictive models, including Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), and Logistic Regression (LR), as well as Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Evaluation metrics of predictive models included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1-score. Results: RF has the best overall predictive performance for ten-fold cross-validation in the training set. The specific performance indicators of RF were AUC (0.910, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.820-1.000), accuracy (0.831, 95% CI: 0.702-0.960), specificity (0.835, 95% CI: 0.708-0.962), sensitivity (0.831, 95% CI: 0.702-0.960), and F1-score (0.829, 95% CI: 0.696-0.962). RF had the highest AUC in the testing set (AUC = 0.854). Conclusion: RF based on preoperative hematological indicators that are easily available in clinical practice showed superior performance in the preoperative prediction of CC LNM. However, investigations on larger external cohorts of patients are required for further validation of our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.