ArticleDigital health
Lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) model for obesity early detection using thermal images.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The presence of a lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) model with a high-accuracy rate and low complexity can be useful in building an early obesity detection system, especially on mobile-based applications. The previous works of the CNN model for obesity detection were focused on the accuracy performances without considering the complexity size. In this study, we aim to build a new lightweight CNN model that can accurately classify normal and obese thermograms with low complexity sizes. Methods: The DenseNet201 CNN architectures were modified by replacing the standard convolution layers with multiple depthwise and pointwise convolution layers from the MobileNet architectures. Then, the depth network of the dense block was reduced to determine which depths were the most comparable to obtain minimum validation losses. The proposed model then was compared with state-of-the-art DenseNet and MobileNet CNN models in terms of classification performances, and complexity size, which is measured in model size and computation cost. Results: The results of the testing experiment show that the proposed model has achieved an accuracy of 81.54% with a model size of 1.44 megabyte (MB). This accuracy was comparable to that of DenseNet, which was 83.08%. However, DenseNet's model size was 71.77 MB. On the other hand, the proposed model's accuracy was higher than that of MobileNetV2, which was 79.23%, with a computation cost of 0.69 billion floating-point operations per second (GFLOPS), which approximated that of MobileNetV2, which was 0.59 GFLOPS. Conclusions: The proposed model inherited the feature-extracting ability from the DenseNet201 architecture while keeping the lightweight complexity characteristic of the MobileNet architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.