Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39193252›Full record

ReviewJournal of central nervous system disease2024

Diagnostic value of soluble Interleukin-2 receptor in patients suffering neurosarcoidosis: A systematic review.

Aditya Chanpura, Rajesh K Gupta, Shitiz K Sriwastava, Jan Rahmig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of central nervous system disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aditya ChanpuraDepartment of Neurology, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Rajesh K GuptaDivision of Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Shitiz K SriwastavaDivision of Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Jan RahmigDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7061-8995

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neurosarcoidosis is an inflammatory granulomatous disease. Up to 25% of occult sarcoidosis affecting the nervous system are only detected by autopsy. In addition, in recent years the suspicion arose that the soluble Interleukin-2 Receptor (sIL-2R) might be useful in differentiating between neurosarcoidosis and neurosarcoidosis-like diseases such as neurotuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, or cerebral lymphoma. Objectives: Therefore, we aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCT), observational studies, and case-control studies evaluating sIL-2R levels in neurosarcoidosis patients. Design: For this systematic review, a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases including EMBASE, The Web Of Science, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar was conducted. The search was limited to the English language and publication date up to January 08 Data Sources and Methods: As part of the search strategy conducted, 6 articles met the inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers extracted the relevant data from each article. In addition, 2 independent reviewers assessed the quality of each study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: We included 6 studies comprising 98 patients suffering from neurosarcoidosis, 525 non-sarcoidosis patients, and 118 healthy controls. Included studies were published between 2010 and 2023. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sIL-2R levels differed significantly between neurosarcoidosis patients and multiple sclerosis, vasculitis, and healthy controls whereas serum sIL-2R levels did not reveal sufficient discriminative power. sIL-2R index was able to discriminate neurosarcoidosis from neurotuberculosis, bacterial/viral meningitis, and healthy controls. Conclusions: In this systematic review, we found indications that sIL-2R may be a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. To determine an additional diagnostic value of sIL-2R, large prospective studies are needed that not only examine absolute sIL-2R levels in serum or CSF but also the dynamic changes as well as the implications of renal function on sIL-2R levels.

Indexed as

biomarkercerebrospinal fluiddiagnosisNeurosarcoidosissoluble IL-2 receptor

Identifiers

PMID39193252
PMCPMC11348353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.