Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39193215›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2024

Application of multiomics analysis to plant flooding response.

Guangya Gui, Qi Zhang, Weiming Hu, Fen Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guangya Gui *College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Qi Zhang *College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Weiming HuLushan Botanical Garden, Jiangxi Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiujiang, China.
Fen LiuLushan Botanical Garden, Jiangxi Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiujiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flooding, as a natural disaster, plays a pivotal role in constraining the growth and development of plants. Flooding stress, including submergence and waterlogging, not only induces oxygen, light, and nutrient deprivation, but also alters soil properties through prolonged inundation, further impeding plant growth and development. However, hypoxia (or anoxia) is the most serious and direct damage to plants caused by flooding. Moreover, flooding disrupts the structural integrity of plant cell walls and compromises endoplasmic reticulum functionality, while hindering nutrient absorption and shifting metabolic processes from normal aerobic respiration to anaerobic respiration. It can be asserted that flooding exerts comprehensive effects on plants encompassing phenotypic changes, transcriptional alterations, protein dynamics, and metabolic shifts. To adapt to flooding environments, plants employ corresponding adaptive mechanisms at the phenotypic level while modulating transcriptomic profiles, proteomic characteristics, and metabolite levels. Hence, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomics investigations conducted on flooding stress on model plants and major crops, elucidating their response mechanisms from diverse omics perspectives.

Indexed as

floodinghypoxiametabolomicsproteomicssubmergencetranscriptomicswaterlogging

Identifiers

PMID39193215
PMCPMC11347887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.