ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2024
Biomarkers associated with immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting CD6 in solid tumors: safety, early efficacy, and mechanistic insights from a proof-of-concept trial of itolizumab.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- From real-world pharmacovigilance data to clinical practice: a geriatric-specific predictive model for immune-related adverse events in lung cancer based on routine clinical indicators.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Toward Precision Health in Autoimmunity and Immune-Related Adverse Events: The Autoantibody Reactome, Spatial Omics, and Multimodal Data Integration.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Blood parameters and whole-blood transcriptomics associated with immune-related adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma during nivolumab plus ipilimumab.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for gastric cancer: current status, therapeutic challenges, and future prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- [Management of immune-related cutaneous toxicities].Magyar onkologia · 2025Review
- The Search for Predictive Biomarkers in Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Associated Adverse Events.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) constitute a pivotal class of immunotherapeutic drugs in cancer treatment. However, their widespread clinical application has led to a notable surge in immune-related adverse events (irAEs), significantly affecting the efficacy and survival rates of patients undergoing ICI therapy. While conventional hematological and imaging tests are adept at detecting organ-specific toxicities, distinguishing adverse reactions from those induced by viruses, bacteria, or immune diseases remains a formidable challenge. Consequently, there exists an urgent imperative for reliable biomarkers capable of accurately predicting or diagnosing irAEs. Thus, a thorough review of existing studies on irAEs biomarkers is indispensable. Our review commences by providing a succinct overview of major irAEs, followed by a comprehensive summary of irAEs biomarkers across various dimensions. Furthermore, we delve into innovative methodologies such as machine learning, single-cell RNA sequencing, multiomics analysis, and gut microbiota profiling to identify novel, robust biomarkers that can facilitate precise irAEs diagnosis or prediction. Lastly, this review furnishes a concise exposition of irAEs mechanisms to augment understanding of irAEs prediction, diagnosis, and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.