Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39193138›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024

Efficacy and safety of elobixibat in combination with or switched from conventional treatments of chronic constipation: A retrospective observational study.

Takaaki Eguchi, Osamu Inatomi, Shuhei Shintani, Kenji Momose, Tomoya Sako, Megumi Takagi, Daiki Fumihara, Kazuki Inoue, Norio Katayama, Toshiyuki Morisawa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Elobixibat Improves Stool/Gas Distribution and Fecal Bile Acids in Older Adults With Chronic Constipation.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Takaaki EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9026-4808
Osamu InatomiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine Shiga University of Medical Science Shiga Japan.
Shuhei ShintaniDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine Shiga University of Medical Science Shiga Japan.
Kenji MomoseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital Osaka Japan.
Tomoya SakoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital Osaka Japan.
Megumi TakagiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital Osaka Japan.
Daiki FumiharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kazuki InoueDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital Osaka Japan.
Norio KatayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital Osaka Japan.
Toshiyuki MorisawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital Osaka Japan.
Takumi OtaMedical Affairs Department Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5052-3754
Yoshihisa TsujiDepartment of General Medicine Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital Shiga Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Elobixibat is a triple mode of action laxative that increases water secretion into the colon, promotes colonic motility, and reestablishes the defecation desire. This study aims to evaluate the effectivity and safety of elobixibat in chronic constipation (CC) patients refractory to conventional laxatives. Methods: A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted in refractory CC patients diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria and received elobixibat between April 2018 and June 2022 at Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital. Data were collected for spontaneous bowel movement (SBM), Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) scores, abdominal symptoms, and adverse events. Results: Eligible 311 patients were selected for the analysis. Two-week Elobixibat treatment significantly increased SBM (times/week) from 2.9 ± 1.9 to 4.3 ± 1.9 ( Conclusion: Elobixibat was effective in patients who were refractory to other laxatives, irrespective of previous therapy or patient characteristics. Elobixibat may contribute to resolving polypharmacy with single mode of action laxatives.

Indexed as

Bristol stool form scalechronic constipationelobixibatlaxative refractoryspontaneous bowel movement

Identifiers

PMID39193138
PMCPMC11347617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.