Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39193127›Full record

ArticleClinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.)

Application of volumetric absorptive microsampling for robust, high-throughput mass spectrometric quantification of circulating protein biomarkers.

Irene van den Broek, Qin Fu, Stuart Kushon, Michael P Kowalski, Kevin Millis, Andrew Percy, Ronald J Holewinski, Vidya Venkatraman, Jennifer E Van Eyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Is this the end of dried blood spots as we know it?Analytical science advances · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Smidt Heart Institute Takotsubo Registry - Study design and baseline characteristics.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Irene van den BroekAdvanced Clinical Biosystems Research Institute, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Qin FuAdvanced Clinical Biosystems Research Institute, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stuart KushonNeoteryx®, Torrance, CA, USA.
Michael P KowalskiBeckman Coulter Life Sciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kevin MillisCambridge Isotope Laboratories, Tewksbury, MA, USA.
Andrew PercyCambridge Isotope Laboratories, Tewksbury, MA, USA.
Ronald J HolewinskiAdvanced Clinical Biosystems Research Institute, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Vidya VenkatramanAdvanced Clinical Biosystems Research Institute, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jennifer E Van EykAdvanced Clinical Biosystems Research Institute, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Genomic and Proteomic Architecture of AtherosclerosisR01HL111362 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HERRINGTON, DAVID MCLEOD · 2012 to 2021
$17.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric absorptive micro sampling (VAMS™) allows accurate sampling of 10 µL of blood from a minimally invasive finger prick and could enable remote personalized health monitoring. Moreover, VAMS overcomes effects from hematocrit and sample heterogeneity associated with dried blood spots (DBS). We describe the first application of VAMS with the Mitra® microsampling device for the quantification of protein biomarkers using an automated, high-throughput sample preparation method coupled with mass spectrometric (MS) detection. The analytical performance of the developed workflow was evaluated for 10 peptides from six clinically relevant proteins: apolipoproteins A-I, B, C-I, C-III, E, and human serum albumin (HSA). Extraction recovery from blood with three different levels of hematocrit varied between 100% and 111% for all proteins. Within-day and total assay reproducibility (i.e., 5 replicates on 5 days) ranged between 3.2-10.4% and 3.4-12.6%, respectively. In addition, after 22 weeks of storage of the Mitra microsampling devices at -80 °C, all peptide responses were within ±15% deviation from the initial response. Application to data-independent acquisition (DIA) MS further demonstrated the potential for broad applicability and the general robustness of the automated workflow by reproducible detection of 1661 peptides from 423 proteins (average 15.7%CV (n = 3) in peptide abundance), correlating to peptide abundances in corresponding plasma (R = 0.8383). In conclusion, we have developed an automated workflow for efficient extraction, digestion, and MS analysis of a variety of proteins in a fixed small volume of dried blood (i.e., 10 µL). This robust and high-throughput workflow will create manifold opportunities for the application of remote, personalized disease biomarker monitoring.

Indexed as

ApolipoproteinsData-independent acquisitionDried bloodMass spectrometryRemote monitoringSelected reaction monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39193127
PMCPMC11322776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.