Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2024
Efficacy of spray flushing in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes: A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validity of the efficacy of the spray flushing cleaning method in flexible endoscope reprocessing.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of spray flushing in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommonly used cleaning brushes in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes often cause damage within the working channels.
aimTo develop a spray flushing system to achieving effective cleaning of the working channels while minimizing damage.
methodsThis prospective study included 60 used endoscopes and 60 Teflon tubes randomly divided into a control group (
resultsThe ATP levels (RLU) in the two groups were 32.5 (13-66) and 26 (16-40), respectively (
conclusionThe spray flushing system demonstrated superior efficacy in removing debris and resulted in less damage to the endoscope working channels compared with traditional cleaning brushes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.