ReviewArchives of Razi Institute2024
COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy among the General Population: A Gender-Based Review and Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in Archives of Razi Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
December 2019 was momentous since it experienced the trajectory of another novel pathogenic HCoV recognized as 2019-nCoV in Wuhan, China, which further unfurled to all countries on the entire globe at lightning speed. The Majority of COVID-19 vaccines are being manufactured using protein subunits, viral vectors, inactivated viruses, as well as DNA and mRNA vaccine platforms. This study aimed to conduct a gender-based review of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the general population and bibliometric analysis. Various articles related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, either based on their title, abstract, or keywords in the search strategy, were reviewed. For COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, we used the definition of "Reluctance to receive safe and recommended available vaccines". Accordingly, 408 articles were included in the complete evaluation and the bibliometric analysis. Data Analysis was done using the Vos viewer Software. The strength of co-cited publications showed strong contributors from the American and Asian continents. The words with the maximum weightage based on their occurrences were female, health personnel, acceptance, social media, socio-economic factors, and ethnic groups, as covered in the red cluster. On the other hand, the Overlay Visualization on the right side, based on the total link strength of MeSH items, showed the largest clusters with items such as females, attitude to health, trust, cross-sectional studies, the acceptance of healthcare, rural population, public health, and parents, which were toward the center. The terms toward the periphery, which had less weightage, need more analysis. Greater perceived susceptibility, risk perception, benefits, and low levels of barriers and self-efficacy were the prime reasons for getting vaccinated, more specifically among females. In most instances, the female being the decision-maker of the family needs to be attended to first as she can further change the mindset of the entire family and carry the future forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.