ArticleCureus2024
Early Outcome of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Through the Oxford Knee Score in a Developing Country: A Prospective Cohort.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The most common degenerative joint disease in adults is osteoarthritis. The gold standard treatment option for this aging society with greater functional demands is total knee arthroplasty. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) assesses factors such as stiffness, pain, function, satisfaction, and quality of life, allowing you to quantify treatment success after surgery. According to published research, there isn't a perfect postoperative timepoint to use the OKS to obtain TKA outcomes. Therefore, at the time of evaluation, the OKS should reflect the best possible outcome for the patient group. This study was conducted to see the OKS in patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral knee replacement at six weeks and six months postoperatively and to see if there was a clinically significant difference in the mean OKS. Methods This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the Section of Orthopedic Surgery at Aga Khan University Hospital, a tertiary care center in Karachi, Pakistan. Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement from October 2023 till December 2023 were included; exclusion criteria included patients who had a recent knee infection and extensor mechanism disruption. OKS was calculated at six weeks and six months postoperatively. Results The total number of patients included in the study was 49 with a mean age of 61.9 +/- 6.1. There were 42 (85.7%) females and 7 (14.3%) males. The mean BMI of our patients was 33.3 +/- 3.8. The radiographic Kellgren Lawrence Grading (KLG) was used and 38 (77.6%) patients were placed in Grade IV KLG, and 11 (22.4%) were placed in Grade III KLG. The mean OKS preoperatively was 12.6 +/- 3.5. At six weeks, the OKS showed improvement, with the mean being 20.6 +/- 3.0. At six months postoperatively, there was a significant improvement in the OKS, with the mean now being 42.7 +/- 2.4. At six weeks post-surgery, the mean improvement in the OKS score was 7.9 +/- 2.71, whereas at six months post-surgery, the mean improvement in the OKS score was 30.1 +/- 3.6. This difference was significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.