Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192905›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Complications Following XEN45 Gel Stent and Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation During Glaucoma Fellowship.

P Connor Lentz, Isabella V Wagner, Christian Draper, Bryan Ang, Nithya Boopathiraj, Darby Miller, Syril Dorairaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Outcomes of the Ahmed clearpath glaucoma drainage device in glaucoma: a systematic review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

P Connor LentzOphthalmology, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Jacksonville, USA.
Isabella V WagnerOphthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.
Christian DraperOphthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.
Bryan AngOphthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Nithya BoopathirajOphthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.
Darby MillerOphthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.
Syril DorairajOphthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose XEN45 Gel Stent and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation is safe and effective for glaucoma treatment and should be taught during glaucoma fellowship training. However, complications may still occur, with potentially sight-threatening consequences. The purpose of this study is to describe the management of complications following a series of XEN45 Gel Stent and GDD surgeries performed over the course of glaucoma fellowship training. Methods This is a retrospective case series of XEN45 Gel Stent surgeries performed on 16 eyes and GDD surgeries performed on seven eyes. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and complications are reviewed. The intra- and postoperative course of five select cases with complications are described in detail. Results The most frequent complications following XEN45 implantation were transient hypotony (10 eyes, 63%), reduced visual acuity (VA) (five eyes, 31%), choroidal effusion (three eyes, 19%), hyphema (two eyes, 13%), and intraocular pressure (IOP) spike (two eyes, 13%). Thirteen eyes (81%) required bleb needling, and three eyes (19%) required XEN45 replacement. Complications following GDD implantation included hypotony (three eyes, 43%), reduced VA (two eyes, 29%), choroidal effusion (two eyes, 29%), IOP spike (two eyes, 29%), implant exposure (two eyes, 29%), and shallow anterior chamber (one eye, 14%). Three eyes (43%) required revision or explantation with a secondary glaucoma surgery. One choroidal effusion following XEN45 surgery and one following GDD surgery were hemorrhagic choroidal effusions requiring surgical drainage. Conclusion Significant and potentially sight-threatening complications may occur following XEN45 Gel Stent and GDD implantation performed over the course of fellowship training. Glaucoma fellows should be ably equipped to recognize, diagnose, and manage these complications both intra- and postoperatively.

Indexed as

complication managementglaucomaglaucoma drainage deviceglaucoma surgeryxen45 gel stent

Identifiers

PMID39192905
PMCPMC11349036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.