ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Ascertaining accurate exposure to aspirin and other antithrombotic medications using structured electronic health record data.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Ascertaining accurately the exposure to antithrombotic medications for both research and quality initiatives has been challenging due to a multitude of reasons: aspirin, the most commonly used antithrombotic, is available over the counter in the United States. Additionally, antithrombotic medications are frequently interrupted for bleeding and procedures. Objectives: We aimed to develop and validate an algorithm to capture accurately the longitudinal exposure to antithrombotic medications including aspirin using the electronic health record. Methods: We used the Medical Inpatient Thrombosis and Hemostasis cohort, which consists of primary care patients at a university medical center followed for a median of 6.2 years. Exposure to antithrombotic medications was captured using the medication reconciliation data linked to each ambulatory encounter. We developed an algorithm that used the taking "yes" or "no" tab as well as start and stop dates to define the duration of exposure for each medication. Eighty charts were reviewed and compared with results of the algorithm for validation. We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Results: The algorithm was 97% (95% CI, 94%-100%) sensitive and 95% (95% CI, 90%-100%) specific in identifying exposure to any antithrombotic medication. This translated to a 93% (95% CI, 85%-100%) positive predictive value and 98% (95% CI, 96%-100%) negative predictive value. When looking at aspirin alone, the sensitivity and the positive predictive value were 95% (95% CI, 88%-100%) and 87% (95% CI, 71%-100%). Conclusion: This current algorithm provides a new and easily adaptable strategy to capture accurately exposure to aspirin and other antithrombotic medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.