Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192870›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024

Integrating musculoskeletal ultrasound as a shared decision-making tool in hemophilia care: observations from a 3-year study.

Azusa Nagao, Satoko Orita, Katsuyuki Fukutake, Hideyuki Takedani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Azusa NagaoDepartment of Blood Coagulation, Ogikubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoko OritaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Ogikubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsuyuki FukutakeDepartment of Blood Coagulation, Ogikubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideyuki TakedaniDepartment of Joint Surgery, Hospital of the Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hemophilia significantly impacts joint health, necessitating innovative strategies for early detection and management of joint damage. Objectives: This study assessed the impact of incorporating musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) into shared decision-making processes on prophylaxis regimens for patients with hemophilia over a 3-year period. Methods: The "Joint Damage Monitoring by Ultrasonography in Patients with Hemophilia in Japan" study was a long-term prospective observational study conducted at Ogikubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. It enrolled 174 participants with moderate-to-severe hemophilia A or B. Participants underwent 6 monthly MSKUS evaluations, generating 3582 images from 682 joints; the findings guided adjustments of prophylaxis. Results: Over the 3-year period, 69.3% of participants adjusted their prophylaxis regimen at least once. Adherence, defined as the ratio of the prescribed to the actual frequency of prophylaxis administration as agreed upon by physicians and patients, was high at the beginning of the study, with an average of 91.6%, and remained high after 3 years at 94.7%. The HEAD-US scores for elbows, knees, and ankles significantly improved (all Conclusion: Integrating MSKUS into hemophilia care as a shared decision-making tool significantly facilitates the early detection of joint damage and supports personalized prophylaxis adjustments, markedly improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

decision makinghemophiliamusculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS)subclinicalsynovitis

Identifiers

PMID39192870
PMCPMC11347854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.