Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192847›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2024

Partisans neither expect nor receive reputational rewards for sharing falsehoods over truth online.

Isaias Ghezae, Jillian J Jordan, Izzy B Gainsburg, Mohsen Mosleh, Gordon Pennycook, Robb Willer, David G Rand

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isaias GhezaeDepartment of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8656-7590
Jillian J JordanNegotiation, Organizations and Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA 02163, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2443-0526
Izzy B GainsburgDepartment of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4363-0494
Mohsen MoslehManagement Department, University of Exeter Business School, Exeter EX4 4PU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-5035
Gordon PennycookDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-6143
Robb WillerDepartment of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3404-6472
David G RandSloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8975-2783

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A frequently invoked explanation for the sharing of false over true political information is that partisans are motivated by their reputations. In particular, it is often argued that by indiscriminately sharing news that is favorable to one's political party, regardless of whether it is true-or perhaps especially when it is

Indexed as

fake newsmisinformationpartisanshipssignalingsocial media

Identifiers

PMID39192847
PMCPMC11348091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.