ArticleBiophysical journal2024
Several common methods of making vesicles (except an emulsion method) capture intended lipid ratios.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification of cholesterol incorporation in giant unilamellar vesicles produced by a modified cDICE method.Soft matter · 2026Article
- Combining Nanoscale Curvature and Polymer Osmotic Pressure for Efficient Giant Vesicle Assembly Under Physiological Conditions.Small methods · 2025Article
- Dimensions, stability, and deformability of DOPC-cholesterol giant unilamellar vesicles formed by droplet transfer.Open research Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Researchers choose different methods of making giant unilamellar vesicles to satisfy different constraints of their experimental designs. A challenge that arises when researchers use a variety of methods is that each method may produce vesicles with a different average lipid ratio, even if all experiments use lipids from a common stock mixture. Here, we use mass spectrometry to investigate ratios of lipids in vesicle solutions made by five common methods: electroformation on indium tin oxide slides, electroformation on platinum wires, gentle hydration, emulsion transfer, and extrusion. We made vesicles from either five-component or binary mixtures of lipids chosen to span a wide range of physical properties: di(18:1)PC, di(16:0)PC, di(18:1)PG, di(12:0)PE, and cholesterol. For a mixture of all five of these lipids, ITO electroformation, Pt electroformation, gentle hydration, and extrusion methods result in only minor shifts in lipid ratios (≤5 mol %) relative to a common stock solution. In contrast, emulsion transfer results in ∼80% less cholesterol than expected from the stock solution, which is counterbalanced by a surprising overabundance of saturated PC-lipid relative to all other phospholipids. Experiments using binary mixtures of saturated and unsaturated PC-lipids and cholesterol largely support results from the five-component mixture. In general, our results imply that experiments that increment lipid ratios in small steps will produce data that are highly sensitive to the technique used and to sample-to-sample variations. For example, sample-to-sample variations are ∼±2 mol % for five-component vesicles produced by a single technique. In contrast, experiments that explore larger increments in lipid ratio or that seek to explain general trends and new phenomena will be less sensitive to sample-to-sample variation and the method used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.