Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192518›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2024

Myosteatosis and muscle loss impact liver transplant outcomes in male patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Di Lu, Zhihang Hu, Hao Chen, Abid Ali Khan, Qingguo Xu, Zuyuan Lin, Huigang Li, Jianyong Zhuo, Chiyu He, Li Zhuang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Changes in nutritional status in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Di LuDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Zhihang HuZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hao ChenZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Abid Ali KhanZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qingguo XuOrgan Transplantation Center, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zuyuan LinKey Laboratory of Integrated Oncology and Intelligent Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
Huigang LiZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jianyong ZhuoKey Laboratory of Integrated Oncology and Intelligent Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
Chiyu HeZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Li ZhuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Zhe YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Siyi DongDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jinzhen CaiOrgan Transplantation Center, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Shusen ZhengNHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China.
Xiao XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2761-2811

Funding

Key Program, National Natural Science Foundation of China 81930016Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 92159202National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFA1100500National S&T Major Project 2017ZX10203205Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LQ23H160048Young Program of National Natural Science Funds 82000617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenia is associated with unfavourable long-term survival in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the impact of myosteatosis and muscle loss on patient prognosis has not been investigated.

methodsSeven hundred fifty-six HCC patients who received LT at 3 transplant centres were included. Computed tomography (CT) images of recipients were collected to measure skeletal muscle index (SMI) and skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMRA). The impact of myosteatosis on the prognosis of sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients was studied separately. Muscle status was evaluated based on the presence of sarcopenia and myosteatosis. The muscle loss of 342 males was calculated as the relative change of SMI between pre- and post-LT evaluations. Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

resultsThe study comprised 673 males and 83 females. The median follow-up time was 31 months (interquartile range, 19-43 months). Prior to LT, 267 (39.7%) and 187 (27.8%) males were defined as sarcopenic (low-SMI) and myosteatotic (low-SMRA), respectively. For sarcopenic recipients, the presence of myosteatosis was followed by a 23.6% decrease in 5 year OS (P < 0.001) and a 15.0% decrease in 5 year RFS (P = 0.014). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that muscle status was an independent predictor of OS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.569; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.317-1.869; P < 0.001] and RFS (HR, 1.369; 95% CI, 1.182-1.586; P < 0.001). Postoperatively, a muscle loss >14.2% was an independent risk factor for poor OS (HR, 2.286; 95% CI, 1.358-3.849; P = 0.002) and RFS (HR, 2.219; 95% CI, 1.418-3.471; P < 0.001) in non-sarcopenic recipients (N = 209).

conclusionsPre-transplant myosteatosis aggravated the adverse impact of sarcopenia on liver transplant outcomes in male HCC patients. Post-transplant muscle loss might assist in prognostic stratification of recipients without pre-existing sarcopenia, intriguing new insights into individualized management.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationSarcopeniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalPrognosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeDeceased donor liver transplantationLiver cancerMuscle massMuscle radiodensity

Identifiers

PMID39192518
PMCPMC11446693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.