ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty using simple X-ray images.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The application of artificial intelligence in the design of highly compatible knee prostheses: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- 3D imaging-based AI models outperform demographic models and excel in tibial sizing compared with 2D models in total knee arthroplasty planning: A systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Implant Positioning, Dislocation Risk Prediction, and Surgical Indications in Orthopaedic Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Foundation models for X-ray interpretation: a narrative review of current techniques and future perspectives in diagnostic imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Selection of joint replacement methods based on AI cartilage model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Consistently high accuracy of digital 2D templating in total knee arthroplasty across different levels of surgical training.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
- From empirical to analytical: Soft-tissue tension gauging in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery & related research · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review From Diagnosis to Rehabilitation.Cureus · 2025Review
- The revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence in orthopedics: comprehensive review of current benefits and challenges.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Use of Artificial Intelligence on Imaging and Preoperatory Planning of the Knee Joint: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Comparison of traditional template measurements and artificial intelligence preoperative planning in total knee arthroplasty.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate estimation of implant size before surgery is crucial in preparing for total knee arthroplasty. However, this task is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To alleviate this burden on surgeons, we developed a reliable artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict implant size.
methodsWe enrolled 714 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent total knee arthroplasty from March 2010 to February 2014. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon using implants from the same manufacturer. We collected 1412 knee anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view x-ray images and retrospectively investigated the implant size. We trained the AI model using both AP and lateral images without any clinical or demographic information and performed data augmentation to resolve issues of uneven distribution and insufficient data. Using data augmentation techniques, we generated 500 images for each size of the femur and tibia, which were then used to train the model. Using data augmentation techniques, we generated 500 images for each size of the femur and tibia, which were then used to train the model. We used ResNet-101 and optimized the model with the aim of minimizing the cross-entropy loss function using both the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and Adam optimizer.
resultsThe SGD optimizer achieved the best performance in internal validation. The model showed micro F1-score 0.91 for femur and 0.87 for tibia. For predicting within ± one size, micro F1-score was 0.99 for femur and 0.98 for tibia.
conclusionWe developed a deep learning model with high predictive power for implant size using only simple x-ray images. This could help surgeons reduce the time and labor required for preoperative preparation in total knee arthroplasty. While similar studies have been conducted, our work is unique in its use of simple x-ray images without any other data, like demographic features, to achieve a model with strong predictive power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.