ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024
Case-control study of the characteristics and risk factors of hot clot artefacts on 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe pulmonary Hot Clot artifact (HCa) on 18F-FDG PET/CT is a poorly understood phenomenon, corresponding to the presence of a focal tracer uptake without anatomical lesion on combined CTscan. The hypothesis proposed in the literature is of microembolic origin. Our objectives were to determine the incidence of HCa, to analyze its characteristics and to identify associated factors.
methodsAll 18F-FDG PET/CT retrieved reports containing the keywords (artifact/vascular adhesion/no morphological abnormality) during the period June 2021-2023 at Brest University Hospital were reviewed for HCa. Each case was associated with 2 control patients (same daily work-list). The anatomical and metabolic characteristics of HCa were analyzed. Factors related to FDG preparation/administration, patient and vascular history were investigated. Case-control differences between variables were tested using Chi-2 test and OR (qualitative) or Student's t-test (quantitative).
resultsOf the 22,671 18F-FDG PET/CT performed over 2 years, 211 patients (0.94%) showed HCa. The focus was single in 97.6%, peripheral in 75.3%, and located independently in the right or left lung (51.1% vs. 48.9%). Mean ± SD values for SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TLG were 11.3 ± 16.5, 5.1 ± 5.0, 0.3 ± 0.3 ml and 1.5 ± 2.1 g respectively. The presence of vascular adhesion (p < 0.001), patient age (p = 0.002) and proximal venous access (p = 0.001) were statistically associated with the presence of HCa.
conclusionHCa is a real but rare phenomenon (incidence around 1%), mostly unique, intense, small in volume (< 1 ml), and associated with the presence of vascular FDG uptake, confirming the hypothesis of a microembolic origin due to probable vein wall trauma at the injection site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.