ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Arthrodesis using Iliac Crest autograft in revision surgery of the first metatarsophalangeal joint total arthroplasty for the treatment of Hallux Rigidus: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multifactorial Non-union After First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis Revised With Structural Iliac Crest Autograft: A Case Report and Comprehensive Literature Review.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe treatments for hallux rigidus (HR) encompass a wide spectrum, including conservative methods and surgical approaches such as arthroplasty and arthrodesis. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of revision with arthrodesis following the failure of the first metatarsophalangeal joint total arthroplasty (MTPJ1TA). MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients who had surgery at two advanced orthopedic centers between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2024, were reviewed. Those with at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up were assessed for demographics (gender, age, side), reoperation rates, complications, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) scores, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal and Interphalangeal Scale (AOFAS-HMI) scores. Radiological evaluations included hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), dorsiflexion angle (DFA), and first ray length (FRL) in anteroposterior and lateral views.
resultsOf 27 patients, 4 were male (15%) and 23 female (85%), with an average age of 56.18 ± 7.49 years (range 41-72). Arthrodesis was performed in 26 patients, with one requiring reoperation due to implant failure. Average VAS scores were 7.14 preoperatively and 3.55 postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average FADI scores were 50.51 preoperatively and 71.51 postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average AOFAS-HMI scores were 51.22 preoperatively and 70.59 postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average HVA was 19.7° preoperatively and 6.29° postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average IMA was 10.66° preoperatively and 11.37° postoperatively (p = 0.406). Average DFA was 34.14° preoperatively and 22.33° postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average anteroposterior FRL was 10.17 cm preoperatively and 10.77 cm postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average lateral FRL was 10.12 cm preoperatively and 10.42 cm postoperatively (p < 0.05). None of the patients in the study exhibited postoperative donor site complications or transfer metatarsalgia, while a 100% rate of bone union was observed.
conclusionWe think that revision of MTPJ1TA with arthrodesis is a safe treatment option. Additionally, the use of an iliac crest autograft can be a viable option to restore bone stock and create a biological environment conducive to fusion. This study evaluates revision surgery with arthrodesis in the largest patient group with failed MTPJ1TA, highlighting its significance in the field. However, further studies are needed to determine the ideal surgical procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.