Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192322›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2024

Systematic assessment of HER2 status in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a perspective on the potential clinical relevance.

Mieke R Van Bockstal, Jelle Wesseling, Ester H Lips, Marjolein Smidt, Christine Galant, Carolien H M van Deurzen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Research progress of DUB enzyme in breast cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mieke R Van BockstalDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. Mieke.VanBockstal@saintluc.uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-928X
Jelle WesselingDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8940-2676
Ester H LipsDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3488-4935
Marjolein SmidtDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8328-1869
Christine GalantDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9206-7864
Carolien H M van DeurzenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.h.m.vandeurzen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0034-7069

Funding

Fondation contre le Cancer 2019-089Fondation Saint Luc Fonds dr. Gaëtan LagneauxKWF Kankerbestrijding C38317/A24043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many countries, hormone receptor status assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely performed, as hormone receptor-positive DCIS patients are eligible for adjuvant anti-hormonal treatment, aiming to reduce the ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risk. Although HER2 gene amplification and its associated HER2 protein overexpression constitute a major prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast carcinoma, its use in the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is less straightforward. HER2 immunohistochemistry is not routinely performed yet, as the role of HER2-positivity in DCIS biology is unclear. Nonetheless, recent data challenge this practice. Here, we discuss the value of routine HER2 assessment for DCIS. HER2-positivity correlates strongly with DCIS grade: around four in five HER2-positive DCIS show high grade atypia. As morphological DCIS grading is prone to interobserver variability, HER2 immunohistochemistry could render grading more robust. Several studies showed an association between HER2-positive DCIS and ipsilateral recurrence risk, albeit currently unclear whether this is for overall, in situ or invasive recurrence. HER2-positive DCIS tends to be larger, with a higher risk of involved surgical margins. HER2-positive DCIS patients benefit more from adjuvant radiotherapy: it substantially decreases the local recurrence risk after lumpectomy, without impact on overall survival. HER2-positivity in pure biopsy-diagnosed DCIS is associated with increased upstaging to invasive carcinoma after surgery. HER2 immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsies might therefore provide useful information to surgeons, favoring wider excisions. The time seems right to consider DCIS subtype-dependent treatment, comprising appropriate local treatment for HER2-positive DCIS patients and de-escalation for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative DCIS patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesClinical RelevanceFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBiopsyBreastDuctal carcinoma in situGradeHER2Hormone receptor statusImmunohistochemistryNuclear atypiaPersonalized therapy

Identifiers

PMID39192322
PMCPMC11348742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.