ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2024
Systematic assessment of HER2 status in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a perspective on the potential clinical relevance.
Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Multi-Omics Reveals Cellular States and Microenvironmental Remodeling in Coexisting DCIS and IDC.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Impact of screening on late-stage breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based cohort study (2007-2016).Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- ERBB2 amplification is a late event in the pathogenesis of high-grade endometrial carcinomas with heterogeneous HER2 expression.The Journal of pathology · 2026Article
- The Complex Path from Mammary Ductal Hyperplasia to Breast Cancer: Elevated Malignancy Risk in Atypical Forms.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Research progress of DUB enzyme in breast cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Quantitative assessment of HER2 expression in invasive ductal carcinoma and co-existing DCIS.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Breaking new ground in ductal carcinoma in situ management: the promise of intratumoral messenger ribonucleic acid-2752 and pembrolizumab.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Article
- DCIS Progression and the Tumor Microenvironment: Molecular Insights and Prognostic Challenges.Cancers · 2025Review
- Clinicopathologic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ and risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer: a multicenter, population-based cohort study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Clinical Proteomics Reveals Vulnerabilities in Noninvasive Breast Ductal Carcinoma and Drives Personalized Treatment Strategies.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many countries, hormone receptor status assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely performed, as hormone receptor-positive DCIS patients are eligible for adjuvant anti-hormonal treatment, aiming to reduce the ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risk. Although HER2 gene amplification and its associated HER2 protein overexpression constitute a major prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast carcinoma, its use in the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is less straightforward. HER2 immunohistochemistry is not routinely performed yet, as the role of HER2-positivity in DCIS biology is unclear. Nonetheless, recent data challenge this practice. Here, we discuss the value of routine HER2 assessment for DCIS. HER2-positivity correlates strongly with DCIS grade: around four in five HER2-positive DCIS show high grade atypia. As morphological DCIS grading is prone to interobserver variability, HER2 immunohistochemistry could render grading more robust. Several studies showed an association between HER2-positive DCIS and ipsilateral recurrence risk, albeit currently unclear whether this is for overall, in situ or invasive recurrence. HER2-positive DCIS tends to be larger, with a higher risk of involved surgical margins. HER2-positive DCIS patients benefit more from adjuvant radiotherapy: it substantially decreases the local recurrence risk after lumpectomy, without impact on overall survival. HER2-positivity in pure biopsy-diagnosed DCIS is associated with increased upstaging to invasive carcinoma after surgery. HER2 immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsies might therefore provide useful information to surgeons, favoring wider excisions. The time seems right to consider DCIS subtype-dependent treatment, comprising appropriate local treatment for HER2-positive DCIS patients and de-escalation for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative DCIS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.