ArticleBMC nursing2024
Effect of self-directed versus traditional learning model on nurses' airway management competencies and patients' airway-related incidents.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04244565 (Effect of Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies and Patients' Airway Related Incidents), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies and Patients' Airway Related Incidents
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSelf-directed learning (SDL) stands as a contemporary approach to learning, offering efficient and sustainable strategies for enhancing knowledge and practices. Given the pivotal role of nurses in ensuring patient safety and care effectiveness, this study aims to assess the impact of the SDL model compared to the traditional learning model (TLM) on elevating nurses' airway management (AM) competencies and minimizing airway-related incidents. METHODOLOGY: The study employed an experimental research design using a posttest-only control group structure within a two-group comparison framework. Seventy-two nurses participated, with 35 in the study group and 37 in the control group at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated with Cairo University, Egypt. The trial was carried out between February 2020 and July 2021. Following an assessment of SDL readiness for the intervention group, they received SDL model training based on Knowles' SDL principles, while the control group received TLM. The primary endpoint was a significant elevation in nurses' airway management competency, with the secondary outcome being a significant decrease in airway-related incidents reported by nurses. Competency assessments occurred immediately after completion of the intervention and again three months later.
resultsA statistically significant difference was observed between the control and intervention groups regarding their practice and knowledge scores, with p-values of 0.02 and < 0.01, respectively. Additionally, the clinically relevant difference between control and intervention groups was evidenced by the effect size (ES) Cohen's d in both practices and knowledge levels (-0.56 and - 1.55, respectively). A significant difference was also noted between the first post-assessment and the paired second post-assessment concerning nurses' knowledge and practices among control and intervention groups, as indicated by the paired t-test with p < .01. Over three months, the intervention group reported 18 airway incidents, while the control group reported 24, with no statistically significant difference (> 0.05).
conclusionThe SDL model significantly enhanced nurses' competencies in AM compared to the TLM. However, the efficacy of both learning models diminishes over time. Although nurses who underwent SDL model reported fewer airway incidents compared to those who received TLM approach of learning, no statistically significant difference was detected.
trial registrationThe study has been registered with Clinical Trials.gov under the registration number (NCT04244565) on 28/01/2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.