Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192302›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2024

Role of age as eligibility criterion for ECMO in patients with ARDS: meta-regression analysis.

Tommaso Tonetti, Rossana Di Staso, Laura Bambini, Martina Bordini, Rosanna D'Albo, Domenico Nocera, Irene Sbaraini Zernini, Ilaria Turriziani, Luciana Mascia, Paola Rucci and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tommaso TonettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. tommaso.tonetti@unibo.it.
Rossana Di StasoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Laura BambiniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Martina BordiniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Rosanna D'AlboDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Domenico NoceraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Irene Sbaraini ZerniniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Ilaria TurrizianiCardio-Thoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Luciana MasciaDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Campus Ecotekne University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Paola RucciDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
V Marco RanieriDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Università degli studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", Ospedale Policlinico, Bari, Italy.

Funding

Italian Ministry of University and Research - Progetti di ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN) 2017 2017J4BE7A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge as an eligibility criterion for V-V ECMO is widely debated and varies among healthcare institutions. We examined how age relates to mortality in patients undergoing V-V ECMO for ARDS.

methodsSystematic review and meta-regression of clinical studies published between 2015 and June 2024. Studies involving at least 6 ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO, with specific data on ICU and/or hospital mortality and patient age were included. The search strategy was executed in PubMed, limited to English-language. COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 populations were analyzed separately. Meta-regressions of mortality outcomes on age were performed using gender, BMI, SAPS II, APACHE II, Charlson comorbidity index or SOFA as covariates.

resultsIn non-COVID ARDS, the meta-regression of 173 studies with 56,257 participants showed a significant positive association between mean age and ICU/hospital mortality. In COVID-19 ARDS, a significant relationship between mean age and ICU mortality, but not hospital mortality, was found in 103 studies with 21,255 participants. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings, highlighting a linear relationship between age and mortality in both groups. For each additional year of mean age, ICU mortality increased by 1.2% in non-COVID ARDS and 1.9% in COVID ARDS.

conclusionsThe relationship between age and ICU mortality is linear and shows no inflection point. Consequently, no age cut-off can be recommended for determining patient eligibility for V-V ECMO.

Indexed as

COVID-19Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRespiratory Distress SyndromeAge FactorsEligibility DeterminationHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsRegression AnalysisAgeARDSV-V ECMO

Identifiers

PMID39192302
PMCPMC11348734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.