Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192287›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024

Retrospective ANalysis of multi-drug resistant Gram-nEgative bacteRia on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The multicenter RANGER STUDY.

Annalisa Boscolo, Andrea Bruni, Marco Giani, Eugenio Garofalo, Nicolò Sella, Tommaso Pettenuzzo, Michela Bombino, Matteo Palcani, Emanuele Rezoagli, Matteo Pozzi and 12 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Annalisa Boscolo *Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, 13 Gallucci Street, 35121, Padua, Italy.
Andrea Bruni *Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Marco GianiSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Eugenio GarofaloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Nicolò SellaInstitute of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Tommaso PettenuzzoInstitute of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Michela BombinoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, IRCSS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Matteo PalcaniSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Emanuele RezoagliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Matteo PozziSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Elena FalcioniDepartment of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elisa PistollatoDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, 13 Gallucci Street, 35121, Padua, Italy.
Eugenio BiamonteDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Francesco MurgoloDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Graziella D'ArrigoCNR-IFC, Institute of Clinical Physiology of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Mercedes GoriCNR-IFC, Institute of Clinical Physiology of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni Luigi TripepiCNR-IFC, Institute of Clinical Physiology of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Leonardo GottinDepartment of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Federico LonghiniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Salvatore GrassoDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Paolo Navalesi *Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, 13 Gallucci Street, 35121, Padua, Italy. paolo.navalesi@unipd.it.
Giuseppe Foti *School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVeno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) is a rapidly expanding life-support technique worldwide. The most common indications are severe hypoxemia and/or hypercapnia, unresponsive to conventional treatments, primarily in cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Concerning potential contraindications, there is no mention of microbiological history, especially related to multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria isolated before V-V ECMO placement. Our study aims to investigate: (i) the prevalence and incidence of MDR Gram-negative (GN) bacteria in a cohort of V-V ECMOs; (ii) the risk of 1-year mortality, especially in the case of predetected MDR GN bacteria; and (iii) the impact of annual hospital V-V ECMO volume on the probability of acquiring MDR GN bacteria.

methodsAll consecutive adults admitted to the Intensive Care Units of 5 Italian university-affiliated hospitals and requiring V-V ECMO were screened. Exclusion criteria were age < 18 years, pregnancy, veno-arterial or mixed ECMO-configuration, incomplete records, survival < 24 h after V-V ECMO. A standard protocol of microbiological surveillance was applied and MDR profiles were identified using in vitro susceptibility tests. Cox-proportional hazards models were applied for investigating mortality.

resultsTwo hundred and seventy-nine V-V ECMO patients (72% male) were enrolled. The overall MDR GN bacteria percentage was 50%: 21% (n.59) detected before and 29% (n.80) after V-V ECMO placement. The overall 1-year mortality was 42%, with a higher risk observed in predetected patients (aHR 2.14 [1.33-3.47], p value 0.002), while not in 'V-V ECMO-acquired MDR GN bacteria' group (aHR 1.51 [0.94-2.42], p value 0.090), as compared to 'non-MDR GN bacteria' group (reference). Same findings were found considering only infections. A larger annual hospital V-V ECMO volume was associated with a lower probability of acquiring MDR GN bacteria during V-V ECMO course (aOR 0.91 [0.86-0.97], p value 0.002).

conclusions21% of MDR GN bacteria were detected before; while 29% after V-V ECMO connection. A history of MDR GN bacteria, isolated before V-V ECMO, was an independent risk factor for mortality. The annual hospital V-V ECMO volume affected the probability of acquiring MDR GN bacteria. Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov Registration Number NCTNCT06199141, date 12.26.2023.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationGram-Negative BacteriaAdultAgedFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesECMOESBLExtended-spectrum beta-lactamaseExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationMDRMDROMulti-drug resistant

Identifiers

PMID39192287
PMCPMC11351604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.