SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Intravenous versus topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tranexamic Acid in Lower Extremity Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Oncologic Indications: A Retrospective Comparative Study of 617 Patients.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Preoperative Local Infiltration of Tranexamic Acid in Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Safety in Spine Surgery: Risk Factors for Intraoperative Blood Loss and Management Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid on Hidden Blood Loss in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Patients Treated with Percutaneous Kyphoplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) during spinal surgery has been shown to reduce blood loss. However, the efficacy and safety of intravenous TXA (ivTXA) and topical TXA (tTXA) are poorly documented. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ivTXA and tTXA administration in spinal surgery.
methodsPotentially relevant academic articles were identified from PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, CNKI database, and Wanfang Data from the date of inception until March 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis if they compared the efficacy and safety of ivTXA versus tTXA administration during spinal surgery. Secondary sources were identified from the references of the included literature. The meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook and the PRISMA statement. Data were summarized using RevMan 5.3 software from Denmark.
resultsFour RCTs and one non-RCT met our inclusion criteria. The pooled outcomes demonstrated that ivTXA groups compared with tTXA groups had significantly less amount of total blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-159.55, 95% CI (-181.91,-137.19), P < 0.00001], hidden blood loss [WMD=-132.27, 95% CI (-159.81, -104.72), P < 0.00001], intraoperative blood loss [WMD=-86.22, 95% CI (-99.13, -73.31), P < 0.00001, I
conclusionOur meta-analysis demonstrated that ivTXA was more effective than tTXA in inducing hemostatic effect during spinal surgery. However, the risk of a thrombotic event was not different between the two administration methods of TXA. More high quality RCTs are needed to further confirm our conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.