ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2024
Endogenous capsid-forming protein ARC for self-assembling nanoparticle vaccines.
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in vehicles for in situ delivery: From classical vectors to biologically inspired structures.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Review
- Preparation and Immunogenicity Evaluation of a Ferritin-Based GnRH Nanoparticle Vaccine.Vaccines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The application of nanoscale scaffolds has become a promising strategy in vaccine design, with protein-based nanoparticles offering desirable avenues for the biocompatible and efficient delivery of antigens. Here, we presented a novel endogenous capsid-forming protein, activated-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (ARC), which could be engineered through the plug-and-play strategy (SpyCatcher3/SpyTag3) for multivalent display of antigens. Combined with the self-assembly capacity and flexible modularity of ARC, ARC-based vaccines elicited robust immune responses against Mpox or SARS-CoV-2, comparable to those induced by ferritin-based vaccines. Additionally, ARC-based nanoparticles functioned as immunostimulants, efficiently stimulating dendritic cells and facilitating germinal center responses. Even without adjuvants, ARC-based vaccines generated protective immune responses in a lethal challenge model. Hence, this study showed the feasibility of ARC as a novel protein-based nanocarrier for multivalent surface display of pathogenic antigens and demonstrated the potential of exploiting recombinant mammalian retrovirus-like protein as a delivery vehicle for bioactive molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.