ArticleBMC nephrology2024
How artificial intelligence is transforming nephrology.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond social media: the era of generative AI and intelligent digital platforms in nephrology education.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Advanced nanocatalytic medicine for genitourinary diseases: Reactive oxygen modulation, precision therapeutics, and clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Impact of Query Language on the Structure and Guideline Alignment of AI-Generated Rehabilitation Programs in Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The gut-kidney axis in calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis: Nutritional and microbial insights.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current research in nephrology is increasingly focused on elucidating the complexity inherent in tightly interwoven molecular systems and their correlation with pathology and related therapeutics, including dialysis and renal transplantation. Rapid advances in the omics sciences, medical device sensorization, and networked digital medical devices have made such research increasingly data centered. Data-centric science requires the support of computationally powerful and sophisticated tools able to handle the overflow of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. This is a context in which artificial intelligence (AI) and, more specifically, machine learning (ML) can provide a clear analytical advantage, given the rapid advances in their ability to harness multimodal data, from genomic information to signal, image and even heterogeneous electronic health records (EHR). However, paradoxically, only a small fraction of ML-based medical decision support systems undergo validation and demonstrate clinical usefulness. To effectively translate all this new knowledge into clinical practice, the development of clinically compliant support systems based on interpretable and explainable ML-based methods and clear analytical strategies for personalized medicine are imperative. Intelligent nephrology, that is, the design and development of AI-based strategies for a data-centric approach to nephrology, is just taking its first steps and is by no means yet close to its coming of age. These first steps are not even homogeneously taken, as a digital divide in access to technology has become evident between developed and developing countries, also affecting underrepresented minorities. With all this in mind, this editorial aim to provide a selective overview of the current use of AI technologies in nephrology and heralds the "Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology" special issue launched by BMC Nephrology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.