SynthesisBMC cancer2024
Association of telomerase reverse transcriptase gene rs10069690 variant with cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulatory Variation at TERT and TERC Shows Limited Association with Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease in Carriers of the Mexican Founder MutationMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association between human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) MNS16A polymorphism and risk of breast cancer.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveExisting evidence suggests telomerase activation is a crucial step in tumorigenesis. The telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), encoded by the human TERT gene, is critical for telomerase expression. The TERT rs10069690 (C > T) variant was identified to be associated with the risk of cancer, however, there have been inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis aiming to clarify the association between this variant and cancer susceptibility.
methodsWe conducted literature search in PubMed, EMbase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library up to April 30, 2024. Overall, there are 55 studies involving 334,196 patients with cancer and 741,187 controls included in the present study. All statistical analyses were performed by STATA software (version 11.0).
resultsThe pooled results showed a significant association between rs10069690 and an increased risk of cancer under allele model (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07-1.13, P < 0.001), especially in European and Asian populations. When stratified by cancer types, this variant was associated with elevated risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.15, P < 0.001), ovarian cancer (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.10-1.19, P < 0.001), lung cancer (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.35, P = 0.003), thyroid cancer (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.15-1.32, P < 0.001), gastric cancer (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.19-1.45, P < 0.001), and renal cell carcinoma (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.07-1.55, P = 0.007), while decreased risk was found for hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer. Our results also indicated that this variant was significantly associated with solid cancer (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.14, P < 0.001), but not with hematological tumor.
conclusionThis systematic meta-analysis demonstrated that the TERT rs10069690 variant was a risk factor for cancer. However, the effects of this variant may vary in different types of cancer and differ across ethnic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.