Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192204›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

Optimizing biomedical information retrieval with a keyword frequency-driven prompt enhancement strategy.

Wasim Aftab, Zivkos Apostolou, Karim Bouazoune, Tobias Straub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wasim AftabCore Facility Bioinformatics, Biomedical Center, LMU Munich, Grosshaderner Str. 9, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. wasim.aftab@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Zivkos ApostolouMolecular Biology Division, Biomedical Center, LMU Munich, Grosshaderner Str. 9, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Karim BouazouneDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Tobias StraubCore Facility Bioinformatics, Biomedical Center, LMU Munich, Grosshaderner Str. 9, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. tstraub@bmc.med.lmu.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB1064-Z04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMining the vast pool of biomedical literature to extract accurate responses and relevant references is challenging due to the domain's interdisciplinary nature, specialized jargon, and continuous evolution. Early natural language processing (NLP) approaches often led to incorrect answers as they failed to comprehend the nuances of natural language. However, transformer models have significantly advanced the field by enabling the creation of large language models (LLMs), enhancing question-answering (QA) tasks. Despite these advances, current LLM-based solutions for specialized domains like biology and biomedicine still struggle to generate up-to-date responses while avoiding "hallucination" or generating plausible but factually incorrect responses.

resultsOur work focuses on enhancing prompts using a retrieval-augmented architecture to guide LLMs in generating meaningful responses for biomedical QA tasks. We evaluated two approaches: one relying on text embedding and vector similarity in a high-dimensional space, and our proposed method, which uses explicit signals in user queries to extract meaningful contexts. For robust evaluation, we tested these methods on 50 specific and challenging questions from diverse biomedical topics, comparing their performance against a baseline model, BM25. Retrieval performance of our method was significantly better than others, achieving a median Precision@10 of 0.95, which indicates the fraction of the top 10 retrieved chunks that are relevant. We used GPT-4, OpenAI's most advanced LLM to maximize the answer quality and manually accessed LLM-generated responses. Our method achieved a median answer quality score of 2.5, surpassing both the baseline model and the text embedding-based approach. We developed a QA bot, WeiseEule ( https://github.com/wasimaftab/WeiseEule-LocalHost ), which utilizes these methods for comparative analysis and also offers advanced features for review writing and identifying relevant articles for citation.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of prompt enhancement methods that utilize explicit signals in user queries over traditional text embedding-based approaches to improve LLM-generated responses for specialized queries in specialized domains such as biology and biomedicine. By providing users complete control over the information fed into the LLM, our approach addresses some of the major drawbacks of existing web-based chatbots and LLM-based QA systems, including hallucinations and the generation of irrelevant or outdated responses.

Indexed as

Data MiningNatural Language ProcessingInformation Storage and RetrievalBiomedical question-answeringGenerative pretrained transformerLarge language modelsPrompt enhancement strategy

Identifiers

PMID39192204
PMCPMC11351623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.