Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192173›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Assessing the validity of maternal report on breastfeeding counselling in Kosovo's primary health facilities.

Melinda McKay, Melinda K Munos, Sunny S Kim, Emily Bryce, Hana Bucina, Tanya Marchant

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melinda McKayDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. melinda.mckay@lshtm.ac.uk.
Melinda K MunosInstitute for International Programs, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sunny S KimNutrition, Diets, and Health Unit, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Emily BryceJhpiego - an Affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hana BucinaAction for Mothers and Children, Prishtina, Kosovo.
Tanya MarchantDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1172551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving the quality of breastfeeding counselling delivered by primary care providers can improve breastfeeding outcomes and ultimately reduce mortality and morbidity of children and mothers. Accurate data on coverage and quality of primary care breastfeeding counselling is essential for monitoring progress; however, global and national indicators are limited. To help address this gap, this study validated indicators of receipt and quality of breastfeeding counselling during routine consultations for infant care at seven primary health facilities across Kosovo.

methodsMothers' reports of breastfeeding counselling received during routine consultations for their infants (0-12 months of age) were collected by exit interview in 2019 and 2021 (n = 609). Responses were compared against direct observation of their consultation using a structured checklist (reference standard) by a trained third-party observer at the primary care facility. We assessed 13 indicators; ten were related to the receipt and content of breastfeeding counselling, and three were specific to the provider's interpersonal skills. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) to determine individual-level reporting accuracy.

resultsTen indicators had an agreement rate above 70% and seven indicators had high overall individual-level validity (AUC ≥ 0.7). High prevalence indicators recorded high sensitivity and low specificity, and the inverse for low prevalence indicators. More subjective indicators were less reliable, e.g., mothers over-reported the prevalence of all three indicators related to providers' interpersonal skills.

conclusionsThis study offers evidence on breastfeeding counselling quality by validating maternal reports of whether a provider discussed breastfeeding, the clinical content of that counselling, and how it was delivered. It is also situated in a primary care setting within a fragile state of which there is limited evidence. We observed that mothers reported accurately when asked directly to recall breastfeeding counselling services received. However, there is a need to further validate subjective questions about interpersonal skills and other measures for the 'experience of care' quality dimension.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingCounselingMothersPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKosovoReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultBreastfeedingCounsellingIndicatorsMeasurementPrimary careQuality of careValidation

Identifiers

PMID39192173
PMCPMC11348650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.