Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192141›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

Drawing as a means to characterize memory and cognition.

Wilma A Bainbridge, Rebecca Chamberlain, Jeffrey Wammes, Judith E Fan

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wilma A BainbridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. wilma@uchicago.edu.
Rebecca ChamberlainDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK.
Jeffrey WammesDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Judith E FanDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

The neural and behavioral causes underlying differences between visual perception and memoryR01EY034432 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Wilma A. Bainbridge · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034432NSF CAREER #2047191NSF DRL #2400471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As psychological research embraces more naturalistic questions and large-scale analytic methods, drawing has emerged as an exciting tool for studying cognition. Drawing provides rich information about how we view the world, ranging from largely veridical perceptual representations to abstracted meta-cognitive representations. Drawing also requires the integration of multiple processes (e.g., vision, memory, motor learning), and experience with drawing can have an impact on such processes. As a result, drawing presents several interesting cognitive questions, while also providing a way to gain insight into a multitude of others. This Special Issue features 25 cutting-edge studies utilizing drawing to reveal discoveries transversing fields in psychology. These diverse studies investigate drawing across children, young adults, older adults, and special populations such as individuals with blindness, anterograde amnesia, apraxia, and semantic dementia. These studies detail new discoveries about the mechanisms underlying memory, attention, mathematical reasoning, and other cognitive processes. They employ a range of methods including psychophysical experiments, deep learning, and neuroimaging. Finally, many of these studies cover topics about the impact of drawing as a process on other cognitive processes, including how drawing expertise impacts other processes like visual memory or spatial abilities. Overall, this collection of studies paves the way for an exciting future of drawing as a commonplace tool used by psychologists to understand complex phenomena.

Indexed as

MemoryAdultArtCognitionHumansPsychomotor PerformanceArtistsChild developmentCognitive impairmentCognitive representationsComputer visionDeep learningDrawingDrawing benefitLearningScenesVisual featuresWorking memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.